The true meaning of this prophecy
lies in the timing of its fulfillment. This child is sent by HASHEM as a sign
to communicate a message relevant to the people living in Judah
during this time. The two kings, Rezin and Pekah were marching against Jerusalem to wage war
against it.
“And it came to pass in the
days of Ahaz son of Jotham son of Uzziah, king of Judah, that Rezin, king of
Aram, and Pekah son of Remaliah, king of Israel, marched on Jerusalem to wage
war against it and he could not wage war against it. And it was told to the
House of David saying, “Aram
has allied itself with Ephraim,” and his heart and the heart of his people
trembled as the trees of the forest tremble because of the wind. (Isaiah 7:1,
2)”
Upon hearing this terrifying
news, King Ahaz and the people of Judah trembled with fear. Ahaz is told
not to fear (Isaiah 7:4) and to, “Ask for yourself a sign from the L-rd,
your G-d… (Isaiah 7:11)” Ahaz responds, “I will not ask… (Isaiah 7:12)”
It’s given even though it wasn’t requested. Ahaz was not worthy of the sign, but due to
G-d’s devotion to the house of David, He gives the sign. This prophecy’s
fulfillment is noted later in Isaiah 7 and II Kings 19:35.
Most Christians will say that
this is a double prophecy with two fulfillments. This presents a new and
interesting problem. Since most Christians maintain that the word almah in the
text means virgin and claim the prophecy occurs twice, they would subsequently
believe in two virgin births. This obviously detracts from the supposed uniqueness
of their deity’s conception. Incidentally, The Hebrew word almah means maiden
or young woman, who may or may not have her virginity. Almah is translated by
the authors of the Septuagint into the Greek word, parthenos, a word thought by
many Christians to support their belief that almah means virgin, yet this same
word parthenos is also used in the Septuagint to describe Dinah after she was
raped in Genesis 34:3.
Some Christian commentators claim
that Isaiah was only prophesying their deity’s birth and that there wasn’t a
fulfillment in the time of King Ahaz, but this proves impossible when one reads
the continued discussion of the son in question, “…before the child will know to abhor evil and choose good, the land of
the two kings whom you fear will be abandoned. (Isaiah 7:15, 16)” These
verses are addressing the son from Isaiah 7:14, directly connecting him with
two kings in Isaiah 7:1 whom Ahaz fears.
Some Christian commentators
interpret Isaiah’s use of the Hebrew word ‘ot’ (a sign) to mean that he is
prophesying an event that is supernatural and futuristic. This assertion is incorrect.
The word ‘ot’ is used to describe Tefillin, which are immediate physical signs.
“Bind them as a sign [ot] upon your arm…
(Deuteronomy 6:8)” They are very tangible and they have an immediate
connection from the time they were first taught. The use of the word ‘ot’ does
not necessitate a delay in the application of the Divine message. It means that
a sign is present and G-d is communicating with mankind.
The actual significance of the
sign is a time bound fulfillment; that before the boy reaches a certain age, “the land of the two kings whom you fear
will be abandoned (Isaiah 7:16).” Therefore, it would be evident that G-d
is with them. The boy mentioned in this prophecy is an instrument used to carry
a message. His name is descriptive of G-d’s involvement in an event that is
clearly detailed in the passage. He is an indicator of the moment in time that
this prophecy would occur.
Also, Christians believe the son
is divine, yet these verses clearly state that there is a time when the boy
does not “…know to abhor evil and choose good…” which would not apply to
G-d. The name Immanuel, “G-d is with us,” is
given to an ordinary boy as a sign that G-d will be with the house of Judah . It is
not uncommon for a prophet to name his children under the directive of G-d to
serve as a sign to the Jewish people. “Behold,
I and the children whom HASHEM has given me are signs and symbols for Israel … (Isaiah 8:18)” Hosea also names all of
his children in this manner. It is also not uncommon for Jewish names to have
the name of G-d in them and this doesn’t make them G-d as some Christians have
claimed. For example, Hezekiah’s name means ‘Mighty G-d.’